Thursday, May 11, 2006

Worthington Teacher's Receive a 72% Raise

The information below is directly from the Union contracts from 2000-2007.

For a teacher with a Master's degree starting with 5 years of experience in 2000:

Year - Salary
2000 - $39,162
2001 - $42,726
2002 - $46,614
2003 - $50,853
2004 - $53,880
2005 - $58,637
2006 - $62,784
2007 - $67,386

That is a 72% increase from 2000

Does the Worthington Board of Education really get it???

Board of Education nixes August ballot, sharpens ax

news:www.snponline.com/NEWS5-10/5-10_wolevyloss.htm

The above headline was seen in the current issue of the SNP Worthington News and after the last school board meeting it will be interesting to see just how sharp the ax really is & where these cuts will take place.

There was an obvious look of disbelief and confusion upon the faces of this board of education, gone were the partisan remarks that typically seems to come from board president Gary Tyack (who recently won the democrat primary nomination for the 10th District Court of Appeals) concerning coming to the left side of politics which is absolutely out of place considering the business that takes place during this time shouldn't be partisan to begin with.

"Voters will not see a levy request from Worthington City Schools on a special August ballot."

The presidents of the certified and non-certified employees where seen actively engaged in conversation with board members. Information delivered from within the unions is that at least one board member has given the unions a strong committment to deliver another levy request on the November ballot. The certified and non-certified employees of the district have a fresh 3 year contract with the certified members receiving an average raise of 5.43% for the duration of the current contract, the Deparment of Labor cites the typical worker receiving a 2.9% annual raise .

Recent information released showed that in 1995 the district's enrollement was 10,818 with an annual expenditures of $67.9 million and while in 2006 the district's enrollement was 9,562 with an annual expenditures of $105.5 million. This shows there has been a loss of 1256 students while spending has increased by $7.9 million. There also is a well documented past of the district requesting a new levy every 2 years.

While there was some recognition from some board members that perhaps it was time to actively engage the public in finding a financial solution to the situation at hand it was apparent from at least one board member there was a rather eagarness to begin cutting programs within the district. The district spends an average of $12,000 to get the word out concerning the passage of levys. Those who oppose the levy are left to their own devices to spread the word of why a levy shouldn't be passed.

While board member Bob Horton recognized there was no organized opposition to the last levy that failed perhaps it would benefit him to realize that the voters merely sat down and did simple math to know they couldn't afford what the board had asked for.

While alot of the these taxpayers work hard long hours day in and day out there is also the segment of the population of retirees who are on a fixed income of which many are past employees of the school district that had attended the previous public forms (which ran 4 to 5 in opposition of the failed levy in their remarks) to request the board reconsider posting the failed levy.

There as well was a certain amount of whining from the board concerning the taxpayers believing their voices weren't heard in opposition to the failed levy. To better understand what the voters are complaining about you need to look no further than the comments there were made election night such as "I call that a mandate. People don't want to pay more taxes and are taking it out on the Worthington Schools" Dr. Bob Horton This Week Worthington May 4th, 2006.

I believe that more accurately the taxpayers are sick and tired of being sold out to the unions at the bargaining table by the school board they elected to look after the taxpayer's money. All except one board member (Marc Schare) gave the unions that represent the district's employees what was asked for. I understand there was a game of 3 card monty when it came to the increase in health care yet in the end the district lost money and the unions once again walked away with their pockets full of the taxpayer's cash in the form of their 5.43% raises.

The big question now is what's the plan and how will this not impact the students of the district?




Thursday, May 04, 2006

Rep. Kennedy Crashes Car Near Capitol

Talk about keeping it in the family here we go and the I wonder how long it'll take Cynthia McKinney before she starts screaming about whitey not being held to the same standards. I for one will agree the Kennedy's have never been held to the same standard as anyone else.

Rep. Patrick Kennedy crashed his car near the Capitol early Thursday, and a police official said he appeared intoxicated. Kennedy said he had had no alcohol before the accident.

Kennedy, D-R.I., addressed the issue after a spate of news reports.

"I was involved in a traffic accident last night at First and C Street SE near the U.S. Capitol," Kennedy said in a written statement released by his office. "I consumed no alcohol prior to the incident. I will fully cooperate with the Capitol Police in whatever investigation they choose to undertake."

Kennedy appeared to be intoxicated when he crashed his car into a barrier on Capitol Hill early Thursday morning, said Louis P. Cannon, president of the Washington chapter of the Fraternal Order of Police.

Cannon, who was not there, said the officers involved in the accident were instructed by an official "above the rank of patrolman" to take Kennedy home.
No sobriety tests were conducted at the scene.

A letter written by a Capitol Police officer to Acting Chief Christopher McGaffin said Kennedy appeared to be staggering when he left the vehicle after the crash about 3 a.m. The letter was first reported by Roll Call, a Capitol Hill newspaper.

Kennedy said he was late for a vote, officer Greg Baird said in the letter to McGaffin. Baird is acting chairman of the Capitol Hill chapter of the FOP police union. The last vote of the night had occurred almost six hours earlier.

Kennedy, the son of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., and his staff declined to discuss any further details of the accident. The congressman took part in House votes Thursday.

Capitol Police did not immediately return phone calls for comment. They issued a one-line statement saying they were investigating a traffic violation that occurred early in the morning at that location.
Baird wrote McGaffin that two sergeants who responded to the accident conferred with the watch commander and were ordered to leave the scene.

He said that after the officers left, Capitol Police officials gave Kennedy a ride home.

Kennedy spent time at a drug rehabilitation clinic before he went to Providence College. He has been open about mental health issues, including being diagnosed with bipolar disorder.

© 2006 Associated Press.

Worthington School levy soundly defeated 58 % to 42% margin

Levy Soundly Defeated5.25 mill levy goes down by 58-42 margin......

By Candi Brooks
This Week Staff Writer

As school board member Bob Horton gazed at the precinct-by-precinct voting results on the screen in front of him Tuesday night, he could read the message on the wall. It was "no," plain and simple.With 53 of 56 Worthington school district precincts reported in on Tuesday night, the 5.25-mill Worthington levy was being defeated by a margin of 58 to 42.

The unofficial breakdown was 4,944 votes for the levy, 6,833 votes against."These are strong numbers," Horton said. "I call that a mandate. People don't want to pay more taxes and they are taking it out on the Worthington schools." Horton said the board will definitely return a levy to the voters by the end of the year. The only question is timing-the August ballot or the November ballot. The size of the levy cannot be the same, though. "There is no way we can go back to the votes with that same amount," he said. "We're going to have to make some serious adjustments."

Meanwhile, the district must be ready to make budget reductions if voters do no approve a levy in 2006, said Superintendent Melissa Conrath."We can't go into the school year without a plan in place to make ends meet,"she said. Though she has only been in the district for four months, the message she heard as she met with voters was that there were weary of frequent levy requests.

The district has placed three levies on the ballot in the past five years. Horton said he was surprised that the out-come was not closer. "What's interesting is there really wasn't any opposition," he said. "The numbers are like in the past when we've had organized opposition."

Though they steadfastly declined to call themselves levy opponents, John Herrington and Mike Alfred formed in March an organization called Educate Worthington.On it's website and in a public forum, Educate Worthington provided information about school spending that was not available from the district of levy supporters. The web site received 1,300 hits in two months."I've been optimistic that people are ready for a change," Herrington said Tuesday night. Like Horton, Alfred was surprised by the lopsided results. "There is no glee in this, but the reality is they can't continue to aske for money every two years," he said.

Levy campaign co-chair Saul Seigel said he hopes residents of all districts will join together to force state lawmakers to find a better way to fund schools in Ohio. In short the school board must make some tough choices, he said. It is incumbent upon the board of education to do things that won't be pleasant," Seigel said.

The issue was a combination operating/improvements levy. Five mills would have allowed the district to continue offering current programs. Without it, the district will face a $6-million deficit at the end of the 2007-08 school year.

The permanent improvements part of the levy would have raised $11.4-million over the next five years, or apporximately $2.3-million a year to oay for capital projects like computers, buses and building repairs.

The levy would have cost the owner of a $100,000 home an additional $191.41 annually in property taxes. That property owner already pays $1,276.25 to the schools each year.

cbrooks@thisweeknews.com


"These are strong numbers," Horton said. "I call that a mandate. People don't want to pay more taxes and they are taking it out on the Worthington schools." "What's interesting is there really wasn't any opposition," he said. "The numbers are like in the past when we've had organized opposition."

I guess someone has been asleep during the board meetings or just downright ignored those citizens who took time out of their day to make their views crystal clear to the board of education.

In short the school board must make some tough choices, he said. It is incumbent upon the board of education to do things that won't be pleasant," Seigel said.

Don't worry the teacher's contracts are safe and that's the most important thing of all. Those raises are nearly double what the typical employee recieves. There are many within our community that have just as important jobs and yet receive far less in compensation.

There are federal grants available for some of the district's needs I guess Worthington is too good to take a federal grant, they must view it as taking a hand out. At one school board meeting a teacher from within the school district that teachs in Columbus offered to provide information that gave the schools grants for the much needed computers.

Yet at the same time their teachers won't tell them how they've no compassion by asking the taxpayers to give up things in their own lives because of the educational elitism and entitlement they believe are theirs because they're teachers.

Our communities would really be in trouble if the many other professions that keep our country alive & well pulled the same stunt.

Remember this is the same thing the UAW is waking up to and it never fails to amaze me that the UAW at Delphi is ready to strike really screwing themselves. They will in turn screw the auto industry as we currently know it and our economy.

Yet at the same time they believe much like the illegal aliens (these people are criminals) who are attempting economic blackmail by yet more days of threatened boycotts against the sovereignty of the US because they don't like our immigration laws.